Mathematical writings by Steve Cheng
The following are some notes I made for my own studies.
But they are free, so you may find
them a useful alternative or supplement
to the standard textbooks, or as an introduction
to the topic before reading more advanced works.
Warning: there may be mistakes in these notes.
Some of them, and other omissions, are listed below.
I should get around to fixing them eventually.
- (taylor) We should write out the induction argument in Remark
4.9. The result is self-evident but the notation messy.
- (taylor) In remark 4.5, do not mention the function $J$.
(The section that mentions $J$ was later moved, and I forgot to revise
the comment.)
- (taylor) Should we discuss more kinds of derivatives?
(e.g. in topological vector spaces)
- (lebesgue) I think we should make clear the distinction
between $\R$ and $[-\infty, +\infty]$ after all.
(Because I plan to write a section on signed measures, and signed
measures are not allowed to take infinite values.)
- (lebesgue) Finish the bits on complete measures.
- (lebesgue) Prove associativity of finite product measure.
- (lebesgue) Replace the whole section on vector-valued integrals
with a more general treatment of integration in Banach spaces.
Ideally I want to have enough machinery to define stochastic integrals.
- (lebesgue) Write an introduction to geometric measure theory.
- (lebesgue) Can we write a nice treatment on the Riesz Representation
Theorem? The proof in Folland is fairly messy; I do not know if I can
improve on it.
- (lebesgue) The section on construction of Lebesgue measure
could use some diagrams.
So does the section on Stieljes measure (where did I get those funny
estimates?)
- (lebesgue) The third last paragraph of the proof of Theorem 9.1
has a small mistake. It assumes that if $A_i$ covers $C$, then
$\closure{A_i}$ covers $\closure{C}$. This is patently false.
But this problem is easy to fix, just expand each $A_i$ a little
bit beforehand.
- (lebesgue) Revise the silly footnote on page 4.
- (lebesgue) Perhaps we should use $\cM$ instead of $\cA$ to denote
sigma-algebras. The notation right now leads to a little confusion
when algebras are involved.
Recent changes
- 2007-07-29
- I am now undertaking a rewrite and expansion of the
measure theory book. As it will take a while to finish;
I am making a draft available.
- 2006-11-30
- Added article on differentiation under the integral sign
- 2006-09-02
- (cond. prob.) Added an example application in Proposition 10.4.
- 2006-08-18
- (cond. prob.) Fixed a mistake in the statement of a theorem. Some
proofs had employed the incorrect version of that theorem, and these were
fixed too.
- 2006-08-16
- (cond. prob.) Fixed some typos, and added a few more intuitive explanations.
- 2006-06-30
- Added summary on method of characteristics
- 2006-02-16
- (taylor) Fixed the error in the proof that the Taylor
polynomial is $o(\norm{x-a}^n)$. Fixed a typo in the product rule corollary.
PlanetMath
I am also a contributor
to the PlanetMath encyclopedia of mathematics.
Some of my other
mathematical expositions may be found there.
Math and computers
Steve Cheng <steve.ckp@gmail.com>